State v. Davis

397 S.W.3d 487, 2013 WL 602996, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 202
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Davis. Read the opinion of the Court — 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 1050
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided February 19, 2013·No. No. WD 75211·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

James Davis (“Davis”) appeals from the trial court’s judgment that denied his motion to withdraw a guilty plea pursuant to Rule 29.07(d). Davis argues that the trial court abused its discretion because he suffered manifest injustice in that his defense was prejudicially affected by his trial counsel’s conflict of interest. We affirm. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Davis, 397 S.W.3d 487, 2013 WL 602996, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 202 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013).

397 S.W.3d 487 (State v. Davis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.