State v. Davis
397 S.W.3d 487, 2013 WL 602996, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 202
This text of 397 S.W.3d 487 (State v. Davis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
State v. Davis, 397 S.W.3d 487, 2013 WL 602996, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 202 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013).
Opinion
ORDER
James Davis (“Davis”) appeals from the trial court’s judgment that denied his motion to withdraw a guilty plea pursuant to Rule 29.07(d). Davis argues that the trial court abused its discretion because he suffered manifest injustice in that his defense was prejudicially affected by his trial counsel’s conflict of interest. We affirm. Rule 30.25(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
397 S.W.3d 487, 2013 WL 602996, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 202, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-davis-moctapp-2013.