State v. Davis
334 S.W.3d 922, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 398, 2011 WL 1004818
Opinion
ORDER
James Earl Davis appeals from the trial court’s judgment and sentence after a jury found him guilty of burglary in the first degree. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Davis, 334 S.W.3d 922, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 398, 2011 WL 1004818 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).
334 S.W.3d 922 (State v. Davis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Manning v. State
334 S.W.3d 922 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2011)