State v. Davis

34 S.W.3d 213, 2000 Mo. App. LEXIS 1783, 2000 WL 1741984
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Davis. Read the opinion of the Court — 1999 Mo. App. LEXIS 229
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided November 28, 2000·No. No. ED 77084·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals after being resen-tenced on a conviction obtained in the Circuit Court of Marion County for attempt to manufacture methamphetamine. In accord with our mandate he was sentenced on the offense as a class C felony and as a prior and persistent offender to twenty years in the custody of the Department of Corrections. No error of law appears and no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Davis, 34 S.W.3d 213, 2000 Mo. App. LEXIS 1783, 2000 WL 1741984 (Mo. Ct. App. 2000).

34 S.W.3d 213 (State v. Davis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.