State v. Davis

958 S.W.2d 573, 1997 Mo. App. LEXIS 2060, 1997 WL 738069
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Davis. Read the opinion of the Court — 1995 Mo. App. LEXIS 918
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided December 2, 1997·No. No. 70584·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Darryl Davis, Defendant, appeals from his conviction by a jury of assault in the first degree, Section 565.050, RSMo 1994, and armed criminal action, Section 571.015, RSMo 1994. The court sentenced him as a prior and persistent offender to terms of imprisonment of thirty years on each count, the sentences to run concurrently.

After having reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal, we find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. Judgment affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for the order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Davis, 958 S.W.2d 573, 1997 Mo. App. LEXIS 2060, 1997 WL 738069 (Mo. Ct. App. 1997).

958 S.W.2d 573 (State v. Davis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.