State v. Davis

976 S.W.2d 623, 1998 Mo. App. LEXIS 1684, 1998 WL 643089
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Davis. Read the opinion of the Court — 1996 Mo. App. LEXIS 1889
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 22, 1998·No. No. 73191·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Andre Davis (Defendant) appeals from the judgment upon his conviction by a jury of stealing credit cards, Section 570.080, RSMo 1994. Defendant was sentenced, as a prior offender, to five years’ imprisonment.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating principles of law would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Davis, 976 S.W.2d 623, 1998 Mo. App. LEXIS 1684, 1998 WL 643089 (Mo. Ct. App. 1998).

976 S.W.2d 623 (State v. Davis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.