State v. Davis

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Davis

962 S.W.2d 465, 1998 Mo. App. LEXIS 471, 1998 WL 112855

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedMarch 17, 1998

DocketNos. WD 51312, WD 53373

StatusPublished

This text of 962 S.W.2d 465 (State v. Davis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Davis, 962 S.W.2d 465, 1998 Mo. App. LEXIS 471, 1998 WL 112855 (Mo. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Daniel Davis appeals from his convictions of second degree murder, § 565.021, RSMo 1994, and armed criminal action, § 571.015, RSMo 1994, for which he was sentenced to a total term of imprisonment of thirty years. On appeal, Mr. Davis contends that the trial court erred by refusing his tendered instruction on self-defense. Mr. Davis also appeals from the motion court’s denial of his Rule 29.15 motion after an evidentiary hearing. Mr. Davis claims that he received ineffective assistance of counsel because his trial counsel failed to inform him of a conflict of interest.

The judgments are affirmed. Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Daniel Davis appeals from his convictions of second degree murder, § 565.021, RSMo 1994, and armed criminal action, § 571.015, RSMo 1994, for which he was sentenced to a total term of imprisonment of thirty years. On appeal, Mr. Davis contends that the trial court erred by refusing his tendered instruction on self-defense. Mr. Davis also appeals from the motion court’s denial of his Rule 29.15 motion after an evidentiary hearing. Mr. Davis claims that he received ineffective assistance of counsel because his trial counsel failed to inform him of a conflict of interest.

The judgments are affirmed. Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

962 S.W.2d 465, 1998 Mo. App. LEXIS 471, 1998 WL 112855, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-davis-moctapp-1998.