State v. Clark
This text of 45 S.W.3d 501 (State v. Clark) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
Louis Clark (Defendant) appeals from the trial court’s judgment and sentence entered after a jury verdict finding him guilty of murder in the first degree in violation of Section 565.020 RSMo 1994 and murder in the second degree in violation of Section 565.021 RSMo 1994. The trial court sentenced Defendant to concurrent terms of life without parole and twenty years, respectively.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal, and find the claims of plain error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no jurisprudential purpose. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).1
[502]*502The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for the order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
45 S.W.3d 501, 2001 Mo. App. LEXIS 617, 2001 WL 345619, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-clark-moctapp-2001.