State v. Davis

962 S.W.2d 465, 1998 Mo. App. LEXIS 471, 1998 WL 112855
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Davis. Read the opinion of the Court — 1995 Mo. App. LEXIS 918
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided March 17, 1998·No. Nos. WD 51312, WD 53373·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Daniel Davis appeals from his convictions of second degree murder, § 565.021, RSMo 1994, and armed criminal action, § 571.015, RSMo 1994, for which he was sentenced to a total term of imprisonment of thirty years. On appeal, Mr. Davis contends that the trial court erred by refusing his tendered instruction on self-defense. Mr. Davis also appeals from the motion court’s denial of his Rule 29.15 motion after an evidentiary hearing. Mr. Davis claims that he received ineffective assistance of counsel because his trial counsel failed to inform him of a conflict of interest.

The judgments are affirmed. Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Davis, 962 S.W.2d 465, 1998 Mo. App. LEXIS 471, 1998 WL 112855 (Mo. Ct. App. 1998).

962 S.W.2d 465 (State v. Davis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.