State v. Clark

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Clark

991 S.W.2d 190, 1999 Mo. App. LEXIS 638

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Clark. Read the opinion of the Court — 2001 Mo. App. LEXIS 1523 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided May 11, 1999·No. No. 74134·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, James A. Clark (“defendant”), appeals the judgment of the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, after a jury found him guilty of two counts of possession of a controlled substance in violation of RSMo section 195.202 (1994). We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file and the transcript. An extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose. We affirm the trial court pursuant to Rule 80.25(b). A memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision is attached solely for the use of the parties involved.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, James A. Clark (“defendant”), appeals the judgment of the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, after a jury found him guilty of two counts of possession of a controlled substance in violation of RSMo section 195.202 (1994). We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file and the transcript. An extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose. We affirm the trial court pursuant to Rule 80.25(b). A memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision is attached solely for the use of the parties involved.

State v. Clark, 991 S.W.2d 190, 1999 Mo. App. LEXIS 638 (Mo. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

991 S.W.2d 190 (State v. Clark) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.