State v. Clark

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Clark

952 S.W.2d 322, 1997 Mo. App. LEXIS 1577, 1997 WL 556045

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Clark. Read the opinion of the Court — 1996 Mo. App. LEXIS 61 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 9, 1997·No. NO. 71770·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals his conviction by a jury of second degree robbery, section 569.030, RSMo 1994. The trial court sentenced him as a prior and persistent offender, section 558.016, RSMo 1994, to nine years imprisonment. We have reviewed the record and find the claims of error to be without merit. An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals his conviction by a jury of second degree robbery, section 569.030, RSMo 1994. The trial court sentenced him as a prior and persistent offender, section 558.016, RSMo 1994, to nine years imprisonment. We have reviewed the record and find the claims of error to be without merit. An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Clark, 952 S.W.2d 322, 1997 Mo. App. LEXIS 1577, 1997 WL 556045 (Mo. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

952 S.W.2d 322 (State v. Clark) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.