State v. Clark

926 S.W.2d 725, 1996 Mo. App. LEXIS 1412, 1996 WL 453432
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Clark. Read the opinion of the Court — 1996 Mo. App. LEXIS 61
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided August 13, 1996·No. No. 67836·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals from the judgments entered pursuant to jury convictions for driving while intoxicated, § 577.010, RSMo 1986, and failure to drive within a single lane, § 304.015, RSMo 1986. He was sentenced in accordance with the jury recommendation to seven days’ imprisonment for the driving while intoxicated conviction and received a monetary fine for the single lane conviction. We affirm. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Clark, 926 S.W.2d 725, 1996 Mo. App. LEXIS 1412, 1996 WL 453432 (Mo. Ct. App. 1996).

926 S.W.2d 725 (State v. Clark) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.