State v. Clark
Opinion
ORDER
Louis Clark (Defendant) appeals from the trial court’s judgment and sentence entered after a jury verdict finding him guilty of murder in the first degree in violation of Section 565.020 RSMo 1994 and murder in the second degree in violation of Section 565.021 RSMo 1994. The trial court sentenced Defendant to concurrent terms of life without parole and twenty years, respectively.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal, and find the claims of plain error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no jurisprudential purpose. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).1
[502]*502The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for the order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
45 S.W.3d 501 (State v. Clark) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.