State v. Clark

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Clark

78 S.W.3d 196, 2002 Mo. App. LEXIS 1020, 2002 WL 987874

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Clark. Read the opinion of the Court — 2001 Mo. App. LEXIS 1523 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided May 14, 2002·No. No. WD 59795·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Randy L. Clark appeals from his convictions of one count of involuntary manslaughter, § 565.024, and two counts of assault in the second degree, § 565.060. Clark’s sole point on appeal is that the trial court erred in overruling his motion to suppress blood evidence seized from him because the State failed to prove that the arrest was legal and that his consent was given knowingly and voluntarily.

Affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Randy L. Clark appeals from his convictions of one count of involuntary manslaughter, § 565.024, and two counts of assault in the second degree, § 565.060. Clark’s sole point on appeal is that the trial court erred in overruling his motion to suppress blood evidence seized from him because the State failed to prove that the arrest was legal and that his consent was given knowingly and voluntarily.

Affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Clark, 78 S.W.3d 196, 2002 Mo. App. LEXIS 1020, 2002 WL 987874 (Mo. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

78 S.W.3d 196 (State v. Clark) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.