State v. Clark

146 S.W.3d 434, 2004 Mo. App. LEXIS 1492, 2004 WL 2340031
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Clark. Read the opinion of the Court — 2003 Mo. App. LEXIS 800
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided October 19, 2004·No. No. ED 83543·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The defendant, Derrick Clark, appeals the judgment entered upon his conviction by a jury for possession of a controlled substance — cocaine base, Section 195.202 RSMo. 2000. The court sentenced the defendant to three years in the Missouri Department of Corrections, but suspended the execution of that sentence and placed the defendant on two years of probation. On appeal, the defendant alleges the trial court erred in overruling his motion to suppress evidence. We have reviewed the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal and conclude that the trial court’s ruling is supported by substantial evidence. State v. Rousan, 961 S.W.2d 831, 845 (Mo. banc 1998). An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Clark, 146 S.W.3d 434, 2004 Mo. App. LEXIS 1492, 2004 WL 2340031 (Mo. Ct. App. 2004).

146 S.W.3d 434 (State v. Clark) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Rousan
961 S.W.2d 831 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1998)