State v. Clark

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Clark

174 S.W.3d 702, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 1587, 2005 WL 2847466

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Clark. Read the opinion of the Court — 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 951 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided November 1, 2005·No. WD 64343·Published

Opinion

Order

PER CURIAM.

Brandon Clark appeals the denial of his motion for new trial on his conviction for possession of a controlled substance with the intent to distribute, § 195.211. Clark raises one point on appeal. He challenges the trial court’s decision to allow the opinion testimony of a highway patrol officer as to drug distribution practices.

Having carefully considered the contentions on appeal, we find no grounds for reversing the decision. Publication of a formal opinion would not serve jurisprudential purposes or add to understanding of existing law. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order

PER CURIAM.

Brandon Clark appeals the denial of his motion for new trial on his conviction for possession of a controlled substance with the intent to distribute, § 195.211. Clark raises one point on appeal. He challenges the trial court’s decision to allow the opinion testimony of a highway patrol officer as to drug distribution practices.

Having carefully considered the contentions on appeal, we find no grounds for reversing the decision. Publication of a formal opinion would not serve jurisprudential purposes or add to understanding of existing law. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Clark, 174 S.W.3d 702, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 1587, 2005 WL 2847466 (Mo. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

174 S.W.3d 702 (State v. Clark) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related