State v. Clark

174 S.W.3d 702, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 1587, 2005 WL 2847466
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedNovember 1, 2005
DocketWD 64343
StatusPublished

This text of 174 S.W.3d 702 (State v. Clark) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Clark, 174 S.W.3d 702, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 1587, 2005 WL 2847466 (Mo. Ct. App. 2005).

Opinion

Order

PER CURIAM.

Brandon Clark appeals the denial of his motion for new trial on his conviction for possession of a controlled substance with the intent to distribute, § 195.211. Clark raises one point on appeal. He challenges the trial court’s decision to allow the opinion testimony of a highway patrol officer as to drug distribution practices.

Having carefully considered the contentions on appeal, we find no grounds for reversing the decision. Publication of a formal opinion would not serve jurisprudential purposes or add to understanding of existing law. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Spino v. Bhakta
174 S.W.3d 702 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
174 S.W.3d 702, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 1587, 2005 WL 2847466, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-clark-moctapp-2005.