State v. Carter

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Carter

519 S.W.3d 816, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 826, 2017 WL 770956

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedFebruary 28, 2017

DocketNo. ED 103570

StatusPublished

This text of 519 S.W.3d 816 (State v. Carter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Carter, 519 S.W.3d 816, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 826, 2017 WL 770956 (Mo. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Richard Carter appeals the judgment entered upon a jury verdict convicting him of multiple counts of first-degree statutory rape, first-degree statutory sodomy, second-degree statutory rape, and second-degree statutory sodomy. We find no error has occurred.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Richard Carter appeals the judgment entered upon a jury verdict convicting him of multiple counts of first-degree statutory rape, first-degree statutory sodomy, second-degree statutory rape, and second-degree statutory sodomy. We find no error has occurred.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

519 S.W.3d 816, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 826, 2017 WL 770956, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-carter-moctapp-2017.