State ex rel. Commt. for the Referendum of Ordinance No. 3543-00 v. White

734 N.E.2d 833, 90 Ohio St. 3d 1401, 2000 Ohio LEXIS 2163
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedSeptember 1, 2000
Docket00-1457
StatusPublished

This text of 734 N.E.2d 833 (State ex rel. Commt. for the Referendum of Ordinance No. 3543-00 v. White) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State ex rel. Commt. for the Referendum of Ordinance No. 3543-00 v. White, 734 N.E.2d 833, 90 Ohio St. 3d 1401, 2000 Ohio LEXIS 2163 (Ohio 2000).

Opinion

In Mandamus. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of mandamus regarding an expedited election matter. Upon consideration of relators’ motion for protective order,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion for protective order be, and hereby is, denied as moot.

Lundberg Stratton, J., concurs but urges the parties to cooperate to determine mutually acceptable expedited dates for discovery. Douglas, J., votes to deny the motion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
734 N.E.2d 833, 90 Ohio St. 3d 1401, 2000 Ohio LEXIS 2163, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-commt-for-the-referendum-of-ordinance-no-3543-00-v-white-ohio-2000.