Paschal v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Elections

Ohio Supreme Court

Paschal v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Elections

656 N.E.2d 949, 74 Ohio St. 3d 1454

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedNovember 14, 1995

Docket95-2071

StatusPublished

This text of 656 N.E.2d 949 (Paschal v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Elections) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Paschal v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Elections, 656 N.E.2d 949, 74 Ohio St. 3d 1454 (Ohio 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

In Mandamus. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for writ of mandamus regarding an expedited election matter. On October 31, 1995, respondent, village of Highland Hills, filed a reply memo to motion for summary judgment. There being no provision in the Supreme Court Rules of Practice permitting the filing of reply memoranda,

IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, effective November 6, 1995, that respondent’s reply memo to motion for summary judgment be, and hereby is, stricken.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Mandamus. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for writ of mandamus regarding an expedited election matter. On October 31, 1995, respondent, village of Highland Hills, filed a reply memo to motion for summary judgment. There being no provision in the Supreme Court Rules of Practice permitting the filing of reply memoranda,

IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, effective November 6, 1995, that respondent’s reply memo to motion for summary judgment be, and hereby is, stricken.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

656 N.E.2d 949, 74 Ohio St. 3d 1454, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/paschal-v-cuyahoga-cty-bd-of-elections-ohio-1995.