Paschal v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Elections
656 N.E.2d 949, 74 Ohio St. 3d 1454
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Paschal v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Elections. Read the opinion of the Court — 74 Ohio St. 3d 141 →
Opinion
In Mandamus. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for writ of mandamus regarding an expedited election matter. On October 31, 1995, respondent, village of Highland Hills, filed a reply memo to motion for summary judgment. There being no provision in the Supreme Court Rules of Practice permitting the filing of reply memoranda,
IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, effective November 6, 1995, that respondent’s reply memo to motion for summary judgment be, and hereby is, stricken.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Paschal v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Elections, 656 N.E.2d 949, 74 Ohio St. 3d 1454 (Ohio 1995).
656 N.E.2d 949 (Paschal v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Elections) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.