Paschal v. Cuyahoga County Board of Elections
This text of 656 N.E.2d 1276 (Paschal v. Cuyahoga County Board of Elections) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Relators argue that only the charter governs submission of ordinances proposed by initiative petition in the village under R.C. 731.41.1 Respondents argue that both charter and statutes may apply to initiative procedures where the charter incorporates statutes by reference. State ex rel Citizens for a Better Beachwood v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Elections (1991), 62 Ohio St.3d 167, 580 N.E.2d 1063.2 Specifically, respondents argue that R.C. 731.283 and R.C. 3501.02(F)4 apply because the “charter is silent on the issue of certification by the Clerk.”
Nevertheless, we need not reach these substantive issues. We note that relators delayed nine days before filing their complaint in this case. We have stated that extreme diligence and the promptest of actions are required in election cases. State ex rel. White v. Franklin Cty. Bd. of Elections (1992), 65 Ohio St.3d 45, 49, 600 N.E.2d 656, 659. We do not find that relators employed the requisite diligence required in this ease. Accordingly, the writ is denied.
Writ denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
656 N.E.2d 1276, 74 Ohio St. 3d 141, 1995 Ohio LEXIS 2278, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/paschal-v-cuyahoga-county-board-of-elections-ohio-1995.