Paschal v. Cuyahoga County Board of Elections
Opinion
Relators argue that only the charter governs submission of ordinances proposed by initiative petition in the village under R.C. 731.41.1 Respondents argue that both charter and statutes may apply to initiative procedures where the charter incorporates statutes by reference. State ex rel Citizens for a Better Beachwood v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Elections (1991), 62 Ohio St.3d 167, 580 N.E.2d 1063.2 Specifically, respondents argue that R.C. 731.283 and R.C. 3501.02(F)4 apply because the “charter is silent on the issue of certification by the Clerk.”
Nevertheless, we need not reach these substantive issues. We note that relators delayed nine days before filing their complaint in this case. We have stated that extreme diligence and the promptest of actions are required in election cases. State ex rel. White v. Franklin Cty. Bd. of Elections (1992), 65 Ohio St.3d 45, 49, 600 N.E.2d 656, 659. We do not find that relators employed the requisite diligence required in this ease. Accordingly, the writ is denied.
Writ denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
656 N.E.2d 1276 (Paschal v. Cuyahoga County Board of Elections) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.