Solosko v. Paxton
This text of 119 A.2d 230 (Solosko v. Paxton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Solosko
v.
Paxton, Appellant.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Before STERN, C.J., STEARNE, JONES, MUSMANNO and ARNOLD, JJ.
W.L. Kimmel, with him Leland W. Walker and Walker & Kimmel, for appellant.
*420 Paul E.C. Fike, with him Joseph N. Cascio and Fike & Cascio, for appellee.
OPINION PER CURIAM, January 3, 1956:
The judgment of the court below is affirmed on the opinion of President Judge LANSBERRY reported at 4 D. & C. 2d 240.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
119 A.2d 230, 383 Pa. 419, 1956 Pa. LEXIS 602, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/solosko-v-paxton-pa-1956.