Smith v. State

248 S.W.3d 18, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 57, 2008 WL 123927
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided January 15, 2008·No. ED 89272·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Ryan Smith appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smith v. State, 248 S.W.3d 18, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 57, 2008 WL 123927 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

248 S.W.3d 18 (Smith v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

RIXLEBEN v. City of Hazelwood
248 S.W.3d 18 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2008)