RIXLEBEN v. City of Hazelwood

248 S.W.3d 18, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 43, 2008 WL 123930
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided January 15, 2008·No. ED 89556·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Jeffrey Rixleben (“Owner”) appeals from the judgment of the trial court related to litigation that he instituted against the City of Hazelwood (“Hazelwood”). Owner specifically is appealing from: (1) the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Hazelwood on his claims; (2) the grant of summary judgment in favor of Hazelwood on its counterclaims; (3) the award of attorneys’ fees to Hazel-wood; and (4) the denial of his motion to vacate and set aside the judgment on his petition and his motion for a new trial.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

RIXLEBEN v. City of Hazelwood, 248 S.W.3d 18, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 43, 2008 WL 123930 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

248 S.W.3d 18 (RIXLEBEN v. City of Hazelwood) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Smith v. State
248 S.W.3d 18 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2008)