Smith v. State

142 S.E. 760, 38 Ga. App. 129, 1928 Ga. App. LEXIS 84
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Smith v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 34 Ga. App. 776
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided April 10, 1928·No. 18755·Published

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

The verdict was amply authorized by the evidence, and the court did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial, which was based upon the usual general grounds only.

Judgment affirmed.

LuJce and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smith v. State, 142 S.E. 760, 38 Ga. App. 129, 1928 Ga. App. LEXIS 84 (Ga. Ct. App. 1928).

142 S.E. 760 (Smith v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.