Smith v. State
142 S.E. 760, 38 Ga. App. 129, 1928 Ga. App. LEXIS 84
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Smith v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 34 Ga. App. 776 →
Opinion
The verdict was amply authorized by the evidence, and the court did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial, which was based upon the usual general grounds only.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Smith v. State, 142 S.E. 760, 38 Ga. App. 129, 1928 Ga. App. LEXIS 84 (Ga. Ct. App. 1928).
142 S.E. 760 (Smith v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.