Home/Court of Appeals of Georgia/Smith v. State

Smith v. State

131 S.E. 923, 34 Ga. App. 798, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 45
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Smith v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 34 Ga. App. 776 →
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided January 12, 1926·No. 16945·Published

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

1. The first ground of the amendment to the motion for a new trial is too incomplete and defective to be considered by this court; and the other special ground is without merit.

2. The evidence amply authorized, if it did not demand, the defendant’s conviction of the offense charged.

Judgment affirmed.

LuJce and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smith v. State, 131 S.E. 923, 34 Ga. App. 798, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 45 (Ga. Ct. App. 1926).

131 S.E. 923 (Smith v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.