Home/Court of Appeals of Georgia/Smith v. State

Smith v. State

129 S.E. 5, 34 Ga. App. 234, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 182
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Smith v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 34 Ga. App. 776 →
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided July 29, 1925·No. 16596·Published

Opinion

Luke, J.

Smith was charged with and convicted of possessing distilling apparatus. The sole assignment of error is that the conviction was unauthorized by the evidence. The testimony authorized a finding that the accused was in possession of the premises whereon the apparatus was situated, and further authorized his conviction. The court properly overruled the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smith v. State, 129 S.E. 5, 34 Ga. App. 234, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 182 (Ga. Ct. App. 1925).

129 S.E. 5 (Smith v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.