Home/Court of Appeals of Georgia/Smith v. State

Smith v. State

131 S.E. 924, 35 Ga. App. 160, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 596
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Smith v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 34 Ga. App. 776 →
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided March 2, 1926·No. 16918·Published

Opinion

Luke, J.

The evidence warranted the conviction, and the verdict has the approval of the trial judge; and under the facts of the case, and in view of the charge of the court in its entirety, the ground of the motion [161]*161for a new trial attacking an excerpt from the charge of the court is wholly without merit.

Decided March 2, 1926. C. D. Rivers, for plaintiff in error. J. F. Kelly, solicitor, contra.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smith v. State, 131 S.E. 924, 35 Ga. App. 160, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 596 (Ga. Ct. App. 1926).

131 S.E. 924 (Smith v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.