Smith v. State
131 S.E. 185, 34 Ga. App. 776, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 17
Opinion
1. Under the facts and in the light of the remainder of the charge, it was not error for the court to instruct the jury that “for anyone to take actual possession and control of intoxicating liquors of any amount is a violation of law regardless of ownership.”
2. There was evidence to support the verdict.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Smith v. State, 131 S.E. 185, 34 Ga. App. 776, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 17 (Ga. Ct. App. 1926).
131 S.E. 185 (Smith v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Walters v. State
13 S.E.2d 113 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1941)
Gordon v. State
177 S.E. 264 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1934)
Black v. State
152 S.E. 922 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1930)
Smith v. State
150 S.E. 923 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1929)
Harris v. State
142 S.E. 746 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1928)