Smith v. State
117 S.E. 120, 30 Ga. App. 127, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 302
This text of 117 S.E. 120 (Smith v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Smith v. State, 117 S.E. 120, 30 Ga. App. 127, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 302 (Ga. Ct. App. 1923).
Opinion
The defendant was convicted of the larceny of baled cotton. The motion for a new trial contained the usual general grounds only. The testimony of the defendant’s accomplices as to his guilt was sufficiently corroborated by other evidence, and the court did not err in refusing to grant a new trial.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
117 S.E. 120, 30 Ga. App. 127, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 302, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-state-gactapp-1923.