Home/Court of Appeals of Georgia/Smith v. State

Smith v. State

117 S.E. 120, 30 Ga. App. 127, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 302
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Smith v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 27 Ga. App. 270 →
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided April 10, 1923·No. 14224·Published

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

The defendant was convicted of the larceny of baled cotton. The motion for a new trial contained the usual general grounds only. The testimony of the defendant’s accomplices as to his guilt was sufficiently corroborated by other evidence, and the court did not err in refusing to grant a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Imice and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smith v. State, 117 S.E. 120, 30 Ga. App. 127, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 302 (Ga. Ct. App. 1923).

117 S.E. 120 (Smith v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.