Smith v. State

109 S.E. 912, 27 Ga. App. 798, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 434
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Smith v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 24 Ga. App. 654
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided December 14, 1921·No. 12902·Published

Opinion

Bloodworth, J.

There being some evidence to support the verdict, which has the approval of the trial judge, and error being assigned upon the general grounds only, this court is powerless to interfere with the overruling of the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., and Luke, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smith v. State, 109 S.E. 912, 27 Ga. App. 798, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 434 (Ga. Ct. App. 1921).

109 S.E. 912 (Smith v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.