Home/Court of Appeals of Georgia/Smith v. State

Smith v. State

100 S.E. 786, 24 Ga. App. 349, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 641
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Smith v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 23 Ga. App. 76 →
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided November 4, 1919·No. 10817·Published

Opinion

Luke, J.

The evidence in this case almost demanded the conviction of the defendant, who was charged with burglary. The defendant had the benefit of a fair trial under a most favorable charge of the court. It was not error to overrule the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smith v. State, 100 S.E. 786, 24 Ga. App. 349, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 641 (Ga. Ct. App. 1919).

100 S.E. 786 (Smith v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.