Smith v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Smith v. State

95 S.E. 376, 22 Ga. App. 16, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 105

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedMarch 12, 1918

Docket9438

StatusPublished

This text of 95 S.E. 376 (Smith v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Smith v. State, 95 S.E. 376, 22 Ga. App. 16, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 105 (Ga. Ct. App. 1918).

Pincite

Opinion

Bloodworth, J.

1. When the excerpts from the charge of the court which are complained of in the motion for a new trial are viewed in the light of the whole charge and of the explanatory notes of the trial judge in approving the grounds of the motion, and in connection with the evidence and the statement of the defendant, no error appears therein. See Deal v. State, 145 Ga. 33 (88 S. E. 573); Worley v. State, 21 Ga. App. 787 (95 S. E. 304).

2. There was evidence sufficient to support the verdict of voluntary manslaughter.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, P. J., and Harwell, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI