Tilley v. McJunkin
42 S.E. 741, 116 Ga. 426, 1902 Ga. LEXIS 126
Opinion
1. “ In order to properly present for decision by the Supreme Court, the question whether or not error was committed in admitting given evidence, it must appear that objection was made to it and passed upon by the court at the time it was offered, and also what the objection was.” Cooper v. Chamblee, 114 Ga. 116.
2. In view of the evidence introduced on the trial, the court below did not abuse its discretion in declining to set aside the finding of the jury.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Tilley v. McJunkin, 42 S.E. 741, 116 Ga. 426, 1902 Ga. LEXIS 126 (Ga. 1902).
42 S.E. 741 (Tilley v. McJunkin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Whitus v. State
149 S.E.2d 130 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1966)
Smith v. State
97 S.E. 454 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1918)
Powell v. Georgia, Florida & Alabama Railway Co.
49 S.E. 759 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1905)