Smith v. State
95 S.E. 376, 22 Ga. App. 16, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 105
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Smith v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 17 Ga. App. 693 →
Opinion
1. When the excerpts from the charge of the court which are complained of in the motion for a new trial are viewed in the light of the whole charge and of the explanatory notes of the trial judge in approving the grounds of the motion, and in connection with the evidence and the statement of the defendant, no error appears therein. See Deal v. State, 145 Ga. 33 (88 S. E. 573); Worley v. State, 21 Ga. App. 787 (95 S. E. 304).
2. There was evidence sufficient to support the verdict of voluntary manslaughter.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Smith v. State, 95 S.E. 376, 22 Ga. App. 16, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 105 (Ga. Ct. App. 1918).
95 S.E. 376 (Smith v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Deal v. State
88 S.E. 573 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1916)
Worley v. State
95 S.E. 304 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1918)