Smith v. State

87 S.E. 713, 17 Ga. App. 480, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 716
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided January 11, 1916·No. 6996·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Wade, J.

1. The trial judge did not abuse his discretion in overruling the motion for a continuance.

2. There' was no error in this case in admitting the evidence against the [481]*481defendant, though it was obtained by an illegal search of his premises. Duren v. Thomasville, 125 Ga. 1 (53 S. E. 814); McAllister v. State, 17 Ga. App. 159 (86 S. E. 412).

Decided January 11, 1916. Accusation of sale of liquor; from city court of Polk county— Judge John K. Davis. September 25, 1915. Irwin &-Tison, for plaintiff in error. J. A. Wright, solicitor, E. 8. Ault, contra.

3. The evidence authorized the verdict, and the court did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial. Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smith v. State, 87 S.E. 713, 17 Ga. App. 480, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 716 (Ga. Ct. App. 1916).

87 S.E. 713 (Smith v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hammock v. State
134 S.E. 121 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1926)