Smith v. State

82 S.E. 377, 14 Ga. App. 823, 1914 Ga. App. LEXIS 472
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Smith v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 11 Ga. App. 89
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided July 21, 1914·No. 5758·Published

Opinion

Wade, J.

The evidence was sufficient to support a verdict of guilty, under section 387 of the Penal Code of 1910; and since the trial judge refused to grant a new trial, this court can not, under the limitations fixed by the law of its being, say that he abused his discretion, nor can it disturb his judgment merely 'on account of the “weakness of the case.”

Judgment affirmed'.

Roan, J., absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smith v. State, 82 S.E. 377, 14 Ga. App. 823, 1914 Ga. App. LEXIS 472 (Ga. Ct. App. 1914).

82 S.E. 377 (Smith v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.