Smith v. State
81 S.E. 801, 14 Ga. App. 577, 1914 Ga. App. LEXIS 385
Opinion
Where one charged with the offense of selling intoxicating liquor makes the defense that he was acting merely as agent for the purchaser, it devolves upon the jury trying the case to determine his actual relation to the act charged; and where the evidence is sufficient to sustain the verdict rendered, the discretion of the trial judge in denying a motion for new trial, based entirely on the weakness of the proof offered in behalf of the State, will not be interfered with. Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Smith v. State, 81 S.E. 801, 14 Ga. App. 577, 1914 Ga. App. LEXIS 385 (Ga. Ct. App. 1914).
81 S.E. 801 (Smith v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Mulling v. State
88 S.E. 709 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1916)