Smith v. State

87 S.E. 713, 17 Ga. App. 480, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 716
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJanuary 11, 1916
Docket6996
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 87 S.E. 713 (Smith v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Smith v. State, 87 S.E. 713, 17 Ga. App. 480, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 716 (Ga. Ct. App. 1916).

Opinion

Wade, J.

1. The trial judge did not abuse his discretion in overruling the motion for a continuance.

2. There' was no error in this case in admitting the evidence against the [481]*481defendant, though it was obtained by an illegal search of his premises. Duren v. Thomasville, 125 Ga. 1 (53 S. E. 814); McAllister v. State, 17 Ga. App. 159 (86 S. E. 412).

Decided January 11, 1916. Accusation of sale of liquor; from city court of Polk county— Judge John K. Davis. September 25, 1915. Irwin &-Tison, for plaintiff in error. J. A. Wright, solicitor, E. 8. Ault, contra.

3. The evidence authorized the verdict, and the court did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial. Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hammock v. State
134 S.E. 121 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1926)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
87 S.E. 713, 17 Ga. App. 480, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 716, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/smith-v-state-gactapp-1916.