Shotts v. Standard Oil Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Shotts v. Standard Oil Co.

232 N.W. 714, 181 Minn. 391, 1930 Minn. LEXIS 987

CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota

DecidedOctober 24, 1930

DocketNo. 27,878.

StatusPublished

This text of 232 N.W. 714 (Shotts v. Standard Oil Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Shotts v. Standard Oil Co., 232 N.W. 714, 181 Minn. 391, 1930 Minn. LEXIS 987 (Mich. 1930).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This action grows out of the accident which gave rise to the case of John C. Shotts, father and natural guardian of Arthur Charles Shotts, a minor, v. Standard Oil Company of Indiana and A. C. Sailstead, 181 Minn. 386, 232 N. W. 712. It is by the father of the injured minor to recover damages in his own behalf.

For the reasons stated in the other case, the order appealed from, one denying defendants’ alternative motion for judgment or a new trial, must be and is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This action grows out of the accident which gave rise to the case of John C. Shotts, father and natural guardian of Arthur Charles Shotts, a minor, v. Standard Oil Company of Indiana and A. C. Sailstead, 181 Minn. 386, 232 N. W. 712. It is by the father of the injured minor to recover damages in his own behalf.

For the reasons stated in the other case, the order appealed from, one denying defendants’ alternative motion for judgment or a new trial, must be and is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

232 N.W. 714, 181 Minn. 391, 1930 Minn. LEXIS 987, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shotts-v-standard-oil-co-minn-1930.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack