Shotts v. Standard Oil Co.

232 N.W. 714, 181 Minn. 391, 1930 Minn. LEXIS 987
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Shotts v. Standard Oil Co.. Read the opinion of the Court — 181 Minn. 386
Supreme Court of Minnesota·Decided October 24, 1930·No. No. 27,878.·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This action grows out of the accident which gave rise to the case of John C. Shotts, father and natural guardian of Arthur Charles Shotts, a minor, v. Standard Oil Company of Indiana and A. C. Sailstead, 181 Minn. 386, 232 N. W. 712. It is by the father of the injured minor to recover damages in his own behalf.

For the reasons stated in the other case, the order appealed from, one denying defendants’ alternative motion for judgment or a new trial, must be and is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Shotts v. Standard Oil Co., 232 N.W. 714, 181 Minn. 391, 1930 Minn. LEXIS 987 (Mich. 1930).

232 N.W. 714 (Shotts v. Standard Oil Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Shotts v. Standard Oil Co.
232 N.W. 712 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1930)