Home/New York Court of Appeals/Selinger v. Selinger

Selinger v. Selinger

683 N.E.2d 331, 90 N.Y.2d 842, 660 N.Y.S.2d 709, 1997 N.Y. LEXIS 2222
New York Court of Appeals·Decided June 17, 1997·Published·Cited by 16 cases

Opinion

Motion by appellant-respondent for leave to appeal from the Appellate Division order dated October 15,1996 dismissed upon the ground that it does not lie, appellant-respondent having previously moved in the Court of Appeals for leave to appeal (89 NY2d 981) from the same Appellate Division order from which he currently seeks leave to appeal (see, Hull-Hazard, Inc. v Roberts, 73 NY2d 867). Cross motion by respondent-appellant for leave to appeal pursuant to CPLR 5602 (a) (1) (ii) from the Supreme Court counteramended judgment of divorce, dated February 18, 1997, to bring up for review the Appellate Division order dated October 15, 1996, denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Selinger v. Selinger, 683 N.E.2d 331, 90 N.Y.2d 842, 660 N.Y.S.2d 709, 1997 N.Y. LEXIS 2222 (N.Y. 1997).

683 N.E.2d 331 (Selinger v. Selinger) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Weidner v. Weidner
75 N.E.3d 674 (New York Court of Appeals, 2017)
Manko v. Lenox Hill Hospital
57 N.E.3d 1097 (New York Court of Appeals, 2016)
People ex rel. Shabazz v. Richards
27 N.Y.3d 976 (New York Court of Appeals, 2016)
Aranoff v. Aranoff
50 N.E.3d 913 (New York Court of Appeals, 2016)
Dixon v. Schneiderman
25 N.Y.3d 1190 (New York Court of Appeals, 2015)
Behar v. Quaker Ridge Golf Club, Inc.
32 N.E.3d 942 (New York Court of Appeals, 2015)
Butler v. City of Rye Planning Commission
20 N.E.3d 650 (New York Court of Appeals, 2014)
HSBC Bank USA v. Sage
23 N.Y.3d 1015 (New York Court of Appeals, 2014)
Manko v. Strauss
5 N.E.3d 588 (New York Court of Appeals, 2014)
Palumbo v. Palumbo
827 N.E.2d 281 (New York Court of Appeals, 2005)
Claim of the Estate of DeRosa v. Evans Plumbing & Heating Co.
98 N.Y.2d 643 (New York Court of Appeals, 2002)
Matter of Kramer
711 N.E.2d 639 (New York Court of Appeals, 1999)
Stoyle v. Schaub
711 N.E.2d 640 (New York Court of Appeals, 1999)
In re Harney
710 N.E.2d 1089 (New York Court of Appeals, 1999)
In re the Claim of Francis
710 N.E.2d 269 (New York Court of Appeals, 1999)