In re Harney
710 N.E.2d 1089, 93 N.Y.2d 845, 688 N.Y.S.2d 490, 1999 N.Y. LEXIS 114
Opinion
[846] Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that it does not lie, movant having previously sought leave to appeal in the Court of Appeals (92 NY2d 888) from the same Appellate Division order from which he currently seeks leave to appeal (see, Selinger v Selinger, 90 NY2d 842).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re Harney, 710 N.E.2d 1089, 93 N.Y.2d 845, 688 N.Y.S.2d 490, 1999 N.Y. LEXIS 114 (N.Y. 1999).
710 N.E.2d 1089 (In re Harney) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Selinger v. Selinger
683 N.E.2d 331 (New York Court of Appeals, 1997)