In re Harney
710 N.E.2d 1089, 93 N.Y.2d 845, 688 N.Y.S.2d 490, 1999 N.Y. LEXIS 114
This text of 710 N.E.2d 1089 (In re Harney) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
In re Harney, 710 N.E.2d 1089, 93 N.Y.2d 845, 688 N.Y.S.2d 490, 1999 N.Y. LEXIS 114 (N.Y. 1999).
Opinion
[846]*846Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that it does not lie, movant having previously sought leave to appeal in the Court of Appeals (92 NY2d 888) from the same Appellate Division order from which he currently seeks leave to appeal (see, Selinger v Selinger, 90 NY2d 842).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Selinger v. Selinger
683 N.E.2d 331 (New York Court of Appeals, 1997)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
710 N.E.2d 1089, 93 N.Y.2d 845, 688 N.Y.S.2d 490, 1999 N.Y. LEXIS 114, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-harney-ny-1999.