Stoyle v. Schaub

711 N.E.2d 640, 93 N.Y.2d 884, 689 N.Y.S.2d 426, 1999 N.Y. LEXIS 681
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedApril 1, 1999
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 711 N.E.2d 640 (Stoyle v. Schaub) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Stoyle v. Schaub, 711 N.E.2d 640, 93 N.Y.2d 884, 689 N.Y.S.2d 426, 1999 N.Y. LEXIS 681 (N.Y. 1999).

Opinion

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that it does not lie from the Appellate Division order, appellant having previously moved in the Court of Appeals for leave to appeal (91 NY2d 1003) from the same Appellate Division order from which he currently seeks leave to appeal (see, Selinger v Selinger, 90 NY2d 842), and upon the further ground that the motion for leave to appeal from the final judgment (see, CPLR 5602 [a] [1] [ii]) is untimely (CPLR 5513).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
711 N.E.2d 640, 93 N.Y.2d 884, 689 N.Y.S.2d 426, 1999 N.Y. LEXIS 681, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/stoyle-v-schaub-ny-1999.