Stoyle v. Schaub

711 N.E.2d 640, 93 N.Y.2d 884, 689 N.Y.S.2d 426, 1999 N.Y. LEXIS 681
New York Court of Appeals·Decided April 1, 1999·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that it does not lie from the Appellate Division order, appellant having previously moved in the Court of Appeals for leave to appeal (91 NY2d 1003) from the same Appellate Division order from which he currently seeks leave to appeal (see, Selinger v Selinger, 90 NY2d 842), and upon the further ground that the motion for leave to appeal from the final judgment (see, CPLR 5602 [a] [1] [ii]) is untimely (CPLR 5513).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stoyle v. Schaub, 711 N.E.2d 640, 93 N.Y.2d 884, 689 N.Y.S.2d 426, 1999 N.Y. LEXIS 681 (N.Y. 1999).

711 N.E.2d 640 (Stoyle v. Schaub) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related