Dixon v. Schneiderman

New York Court of Appeals

Dixon v. Schneiderman

25 N.Y.3d 1190

New York Court of Appeals·Decided June 30, 2015·Published

Opinion

Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from the May 2013 Appellate Division order, dismissed upon the ground that it does not lie, appellant having previously moved in the Court of Appeals for leave to appeal (21 NY3d 1055 [2013]) from the same Appellate Division order from which he currently seeks leave to appeal (see Selinger v Selinger, 90 NY2d 842 [1997]); motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from the March [1191]*11912015 Appellate Division order, dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the proceedings within the meaning of the Constitution.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from the May 2013 Appellate Division order, dismissed upon the ground that it does not lie, appellant having previously moved in the Court of Appeals for leave to appeal (21 NY3d 1055 [2013]) from the same Appellate Division order from which he currently seeks leave to appeal (see Selinger v Selinger, 90 NY2d 842 [1997]); motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from the March [1191]*11912015 Appellate Division order, dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the proceedings within the meaning of the Constitution.

Dixon v. Schneiderman, 25 N.Y.3d 1190 (N.Y. 2015).

Pincite

25 N.Y.3d 1190 (Dixon v. Schneiderman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related