Home/New York Court of Appeals/Manko v. Strauss

Manko v. Strauss

5 N.E.3d 588, 22 N.Y.3d 1112, 982 N.Y.S.2d 440, 2014 NY Slip Op 64019, 2014 WL 593194, 2014 N.Y. LEXIS 197
New York Court of Appeals·Decided February 18, 2014·Published

Opinion

Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from the August 2012 Appellate Division order, dismissed upon the ground that it does not lie, appellant having previously moved in the Court of Appeals for leave to appeal (21 NY3d 898 [2013]) from the same Appellate Division order (see Selinger v Selinger, 90 NY2d 842 [1997]); motion for leave to appeal otherwise dismissed upon the ground that the other orders sought to be appealed from do not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution. Motion for poor person relief dismissed as academic.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Manko v. Strauss, 5 N.E.3d 588, 22 N.Y.3d 1112, 982 N.Y.S.2d 440, 2014 NY Slip Op 64019, 2014 WL 593194, 2014 N.Y. LEXIS 197 (N.Y. 2014).

5 N.E.3d 588 (Manko v. Strauss) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Selinger v. Selinger
683 N.E.2d 331 (New York Court of Appeals, 1997)