Scott v. Kentucky Parole Board
423 U.S. 1072, 96 S. Ct. 853
This text of 423 U.S. 1072 (Scott v. Kentucky Parole Board) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Scott v. Kentucky Parole Board, 423 U.S. 1072, 96 S. Ct. 853 (1976).
Opinion
C. A. 6th Cir. [Certiorari granted, ante, p. 1031.] Respondents’ suggestion of mootness and motion of petitioners to substitute James Ray Brumley et al. in place of Ewell Scott as parties petitioner deferred to hearing of case on the merits.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
423 U.S. 1072, 96 S. Ct. 853, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/scott-v-kentucky-parole-board-scotus-1976.