Robert J. Scarpa v. U.S. Board of Parole and Walter Dunbar, Chairman

Fifth Circuit

Robert J. Scarpa v. U.S. Board of Parole and Walter Dunbar, Chairman

501 F.2d 992

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedSeptember 13, 1974

Docket71-1602

StatusPublished

Cited by27 cases

This text of 501 F.2d 992 (Robert J. Scarpa v. U.S. Board of Parole and Walter Dunbar, Chairman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Robert J. Scarpa v. U.S. Board of Parole and Walter Dunbar, Chairman, 501 F.2d 992 (5th Cir. 1974).

Pincite

Opinion

BY THE COURT:

The Supreme Court of the United States having vacated the judgment of this Court and remanded the cause to this Court for consideration of the question of mootness, 414 U.S. 809, 94 S.Ct. 79, 38 L.Ed.2d 44, and appellant having filed a motion suggesting that this cause is now moot because appellant was granted a parole effective October 29, 1973.

On further consideration whereof, it is now ordered and adjudged by this Court that the order of the District Court dated February 17, 1971 dismissing appellant’s complaint for failure to state a claim is hereby vacated, and this cause is remanded to the District Court with directions to enter an order dismissing appellant’s complaint as moot.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BY THE COURT:

The Supreme Court of the United States having vacated the judgment of this Court and remanded the cause to this Court for consideration of the question of mootness, 414 U.S. 809, 94 S.Ct. 79, 38 L.Ed.2d 44, and appellant having filed a motion suggesting that this cause is now moot because appellant was granted a parole effective October 29, 1973.

On further consideration whereof, it is now ordered and adjudged by this Court that the order of the District Court dated February 17, 1971 dismissing appellant’s complaint for failure to state a claim is hereby vacated, and this cause is remanded to the District Court with directions to enter an order dismissing appellant’s complaint as moot.

Lynell Franklin, Charles Jones, Lawrence Wilson, and Charles R. Vette v. Pleasant C. Shields, Morris L. Ridley, W. K. Cunningham, Margaret Davis, N. W. Perdue, Lynell Franklin, Charles Jones, Lawrence Wilson, and Charles R. Vette v. Pleasant C. Shields, Morris L. Ridley, W. K. Cunningham, Margaret Davis, N. W. Perdue, Lee Royal Williams v. Virginia Probation and Parole Board

569 F.2d 784 (Fourth Circuit, 1978)

Williams v. Missouri Board of Probation & Parole

444 F. Supp. 473 (W.D. Missouri, 1978)

Franklin v. Shields

569 F.2d 784 (Fourth Circuit, 1977)

Nunley v. U. S. Board of Paroles

439 F. Supp. 887 (W.D. Oklahoma, 1977)

Roberto Baez Cruz, Jr., v William H. Skelton, Individually and as Chariman of the Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles, Charles G. Shandera, Individually and as a Member of the Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles, Clyde Whiteside, Individually and as a Member of the Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles

543 F.2d 86 (Fifth Circuit, 1976)

Cruz v. Skelton

543 F.2d 86 (Fifth Circuit, 1976)

Scott v. Kentucky Parole Board

429 U.S. 60 (Supreme Court, 1976)

Sidney F. Brown, Jr. v. David C. Lundgren, Warden, Federal Correctional Institution

528 F.2d 1050 (Fifth Circuit, 1976)

Cicero v. Olgiati

410 F. Supp. 1080 (S.D. New York, 1976)

Barr v. United States

415 F. Supp. 990 (W.D. Oklahoma, 1976)

Blake v. Massachusetts Parole Board

341 N.E.2d 902 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1976)

Wynn v. United States

402 F. Supp. 1207 (N.D. Georgia, 1975)

Mitchell v. Sigler

389 F. Supp. 1012 (N.D. Georgia, 1975)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

501 F.2d 992, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robert-j-scarpa-v-us-board-of-parole-and-walter-dunbar-chairman-ca5-1974.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack