Samson Dubria v. G.A. Smith, Warden
205 F.3d 1201, 2000 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1894, 2000 Daily Journal DAR 2635, 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 3624, 2000 WL 276201
This text of 205 F.3d 1201 (Samson Dubria v. G.A. Smith, Warden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Samson Dubria v. G.A. Smith, Warden, 205 F.3d 1201, 2000 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1894, 2000 Daily Journal DAR 2635, 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 3624, 2000 WL 276201 (9th Cir. 2000).
Opinion
ORDER
Upon the vote of a majority of nonre-cused regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to this court or any district court of the Ninth Circuit, except to the extent adopted by the en banc court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Samson Dubria v. G.A. Smith, Warden
197 F.3d 390 (Ninth Circuit, 1999)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
205 F.3d 1201, 2000 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1894, 2000 Daily Journal DAR 2635, 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 3624, 2000 WL 276201, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/samson-dubria-v-ga-smith-warden-ca9-2000.