Home/Ninth Circuit/Samson Dubria v. G.A. Smith, Warden

Samson Dubria v. G.A. Smith, Warden

205 F.3d 1201, 2000 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1894, 2000 Daily Journal DAR 2635, 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 3624, 2000 WL 276201
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Samson Dubria v. G.A. Smith, Warden. Read the opinion of the Court — 224 F.3d 995 →
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided March 9, 2000·No. 98-55914·Published

Opinion

ORDER

Upon the vote of a majority of nonre-cused regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to this court or any district court of the Ninth Circuit, except to the extent adopted by the en banc court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Samson Dubria v. G.A. Smith, Warden, 205 F.3d 1201, 2000 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1894, 2000 Daily Journal DAR 2635, 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 3624, 2000 WL 276201 (9th Cir. 2000).

205 F.3d 1201 (Samson Dubria v. G.A. Smith, Warden) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Samson Dubria v. G.A. Smith, Warden
197 F.3d 390 (Ninth Circuit, 1999)